Every now and then, the subject of statehood for the District of Columbia comes up, and whenever it does, GOP politicians in DC go into an absolute frenzy in opposition to the idea. The reason they give in their fundraising efforts (they use everything that happens as an excuse to ask for donations – as do the Democrats) is that this means two more Democratic senators, which, to hear them tell it, would mean the end of civilization as we know it. It would also mean a shuffling of seats in the House of Representatives, where they are apportioned based on census results every ten years through an arcane formulation to decide how many of the 435 seats (authorized since 1989) go to each state. After every census (every 10 years) some states lose seats and others gain. With a population of 689,543 after the 2020 census, DC, should it become a state, would have more people than Vermont and Wyoming and would be on a par with sates like Delaware and Alaska. It has more people than any other state had at time of admission to the Union except Oklahoma. So, the way seats are determined, it would automatically get one seat in the House, and then seats number 52 to 435 would be apportioned based on population, which might give it one additional seat.
That’s four more
Democrats on the Hill, which scares the crap out of Republicans who have a slim
majority in the House currently, and who wouldn’t have a snowball’s chance in
hell of ever winning one of the DC positions in the House or the Senate for
that matter.
So, there’s good
reason for Republicans to be worried about DC becoming a state. But, this is
not the only reason DC concerns them, and has concerned them for the longest
time.
Like many of the
major urban areas in this country, DC has a large minority population and a
large immigrant population, and tends to support the Democratic party. Not only
do GOP pols object to DC statehood, many of them even object to self-rule (they
appear to feel the same about big cities all over the country that tend to be
Democratic-led even in states where Republicans control the state government).
In Texas, for example, the GOP state government has taken over the school
system in Democratic-controlled Houston, and in Mississippi, the state
government has financially starved one of its largest cities which happens to
have a Democratic city administration.
What’s the other
thing that DC, Houston, and some other deep-south cities like Atlanta, Georgia
have in common? Their city governments are controlled by African Americans.
Many people don’t
know this, but in 1820, Congress, which had control of the District, amended
the city charter to allow White men to vote for mayor, but in 1867, after the
Civil War, when Black men were given the right to vote, southern Democrats in
Congress revoked the right to vote for everyone. They would rather deprive everyone
of the right to vote rather than allow Blacks the franchise. Keep in mind;
during this period Democrats were doing what today’s Republicans do—deprived anyone
who didn’t look like them of most rights.
Harry Truman, a
Democrat, proposed home rule and the right to vote for president for DC
residents, a proposal supported by his successor, Dwight Eisenhower, a
Republican, but neither proposal could make it past the southern-dominated House
District Committee. DC residents finally got the right to vote for president in
1961, but still no home rule. Lyndon Johnson,
a Democrat, tried, but failed, and one of the staunchest opponents of home rule
was Republican House Minority Leader Gerald Ford, who was vice president in
1973 when Richard Nixon finally signed the law giving DC residents the right to
elect their own mayor and city government.
You might think
that was the end of it, but you’d be wrong. By 1974, the GOP was firmly on the
path it’s on now and civil and voting rights for the nation’s minorities was
not high on its agenda.
The House still
reserves the right to veto any legislation the DC city council passes, and has
done so recently, and some in Congress have even introduced legislation (which
fortunately got nowhere) to repeal home rule.
I leave it to
readers to make what you will of this situation, but submit that worrying about
the number of Democrats in the House and Senate is not the primary reason
Republicans oppose DC statehood—not by a long shot.
No comments:
Post a Comment