Sunday, December 31, 2023

Don’t blame AI

Photo by Gabriella Clair Marino 
on Unsplash

 Since the launch of Chat-GPT, followed by several clones, mimics, improvements, and other artificial intelligence (AI) applications, there’s been a raft of articles and editorials on the subject, some of them going so far as to present doomsday scenarios, predicting that if unchecked AI will take over the world and destroy us. On the less frantic, but no less of a hair-on-fire attitude, are predictions that AI will make certain human workers obsolete, and will retard learning because students will no longer know how to do research or even write their own essays.

 

Now, there is a certain amount of validity to the latter two opinions. There are likely to be some jobs that are better, more efficiently and cheaply done by AI rather than humans. But I predict that these will be the drudge, number crunching jobs that most humans hate doing anyway, and a computer can crunch numbers faster and more accurately than the smartest human. There will still be, though, a requirement for humans to make the decisions about what to do with those crunched numbers. As for the impact on students, if educators abdicate their responsibility to set clear standards and requirements and monitor their students’ activities, there could be situations where students ‘let the AI do it,’ thus not acquiring research and communication skills of their own. I teach online graduate courses in geopolitics, for example, and I use AI for baseline grading—with extensive manual input from me—which frees me to focus on students having problems, and to have the time to carefully review their written assignments. I forbid my students from using AI to write their essays, and caution them when using AI to do research to verify everything the AI provides them, preferably with at least one or two non-AI sources. Properly used, AI can be an aid in compiling sources for further study, and for establishing outlines of projects.

 

Because AI, like human researchers, is pulling the information it provides from Internet searches, it can sometimes be wrong, just as a human researcher who doesn’t try to verify what pops up on the screen in a search can be wrong. A good example in the news recently was Michael Cohen, Donald Trump’s former lawyer and fixer having to admit that in a court filing he submitted some phony legal cases that had been provided by an AI. You can’t blame the AI for this. Depending on how he worded his search, it provided relevant cases that it found in searching the Internet, but the Internet is like an open shelf, anyone with a computer can put anything on it. If you grab things off the shelf without examining them closely, you—or the AI—just might get the wrong thing.

 

So, let’s stop blaming the AI for things going wrong. AI is a tool, and like any tool, it can be used or misused. Don’t blame the tool, blame the mechanic.

Ballots versus bullets


 

Saturday, December 30, 2023

When both side-ism becomes a betrayal of journalistic ethics

Ethical journalists are supposed to be objective in their coverage of news, not taking sides, and reporting things as they observe them. This is a high ideal, and one to which anyone involved in covering events should aspire, but the past decade, in particular since the election of Barack Obama, the first person of color to become president of the United States, the practice of giving equal weight and attention to all sides of issues has shown what I believe is a fatal flaw.

 

The term of art is both side-ism, or the practice of giving equal time to both sides of any issue. Works well in theory, but in practice, it has some fundamentally serious drawbacks.

 

In my opinion, there have probably always been flaws in the theory, but the drumbeat of ‘birtherism’ attacks unleashed by Donald Trump after Obama’s election, and the coverage given these attacks by the so-called mainstream media—with few of them (in the early stages at least) calling these attacks out for the false, racist screeds they were, illustrate the underlying weakness of giving equal weight to all sides of an issue without exception.

 

Trump, now under indictment on nearly a hundred charges of criminal actions and facing monumental civil liability in other cases, continues to strain the credulity of giving equal time to all views. When he uses Nazi terminology in a speech, he gets coverage, and again, few news organs call him out on it, and then they print his lame attempts to deny what he said without labeling this as another possible attempt at prevarication. He goes on a holiday rant on his personal social media platform, wishing his opponents and detractors would ‘rot in hell,’ and it gets massive coverage, with rather weak prose pointing out how distasteful this is, for anyone, but especially for someone campaigning to be leader of the country.

 

When the current president makes a mistake, it’s given equal coverage with the former president’s drumbeat of mistakes. The current leader’s age is discussed with the same weight, and sometimes even more, as the former president’s clinically obese condition. If Biden flubs a speech, gets a date wrong, it gets equal coverage with Trump’s inability to utter a complete sentence without mispronouncing a word or getting a simple fact wrong.

 

Journalists should be fair, but not just to the subjects of their articles, but the reading public. Readers have a right to know when what a politician is saying is untrue or just utter BS. Every word uttered by a politician, especially one who has a long-documented record of lying, does not deserve to be publicized.

 

Journalistic ethics means giving readers the information they need to make rational, informed decisions, and giving equal weight to both sides of an issue when one side is complete BS is not, in my humble opinion, ethical.

 

Est quod est.

Wednesday, December 27, 2023

The GOP and DC statehood – Why do Republicans hate the idea so much?

Every now and then, the subject of statehood for the District of Columbia comes up, and whenever it does, GOP politicians in DC go into an absolute frenzy in opposition to the idea. The reason they give in their fundraising efforts (they use everything that happens as an excuse to ask for donations – as do the Democrats) is that this means two more Democratic senators, which, to hear them tell it, would mean the end of civilization as we know it.  It would also mean a shuffling of seats in the House of Representatives, where they are apportioned based on census results every ten years through an arcane formulation to decide how many of the 435 seats (authorized since 1989) go to each state. After every census (every 10 years) some states lose seats and others gain. With a population of 689,543 after the 2020 census, DC, should it become a state, would have more people than Vermont and Wyoming and would be on a par with sates like Delaware and Alaska. It has more people than any other state had at time of admission to the Union except Oklahoma. So, the way seats are determined, it would automatically get one seat in the House, and then seats number 52 to 435 would be apportioned based on population, which might give it one additional seat.

 

That’s four more Democrats on the Hill, which scares the crap out of Republicans who have a slim majority in the House currently, and who wouldn’t have a snowball’s chance in hell of ever winning one of the DC positions in the House or the Senate for that matter.

 

So, there’s good reason for Republicans to be worried about DC becoming a state. But, this is not the only reason DC concerns them, and has concerned them for the longest time.

 

Like many of the major urban areas in this country, DC has a large minority population and a large immigrant population, and tends to support the Democratic party. Not only do GOP pols object to DC statehood, many of them even object to self-rule (they appear to feel the same about big cities all over the country that tend to be Democratic-led even in states where Republicans control the state government). In Texas, for example, the GOP state government has taken over the school system in Democratic-controlled Houston, and in Mississippi, the state government has financially starved one of its largest cities which happens to have a Democratic city administration.

 

What’s the other thing that DC, Houston, and some other deep-south cities like Atlanta, Georgia have in common? Their city governments are controlled by African Americans.

 

Many people don’t know this, but in 1820, Congress, which had control of the District, amended the city charter to allow White men to vote for mayor, but in 1867, after the Civil War, when Black men were given the right to vote, southern Democrats in Congress revoked the right to vote for everyone. They would rather deprive everyone of the right to vote rather than allow Blacks the franchise. Keep in mind; during this period Democrats were doing what today’s Republicans do—deprived anyone who didn’t look like them of most rights.

 

Harry Truman, a Democrat, proposed home rule and the right to vote for president for DC residents, a proposal supported by his successor, Dwight Eisenhower, a Republican, but neither proposal could make it past the southern-dominated House District Committee. DC residents finally got the right to vote for president in 1961, but still no home rule.  Lyndon Johnson, a Democrat, tried, but failed, and one of the staunchest opponents of home rule was Republican House Minority Leader Gerald Ford, who was vice president in 1973 when Richard Nixon finally signed the law giving DC residents the right to elect their own mayor and city government.

 

You might think that was the end of it, but you’d be wrong. By 1974, the GOP was firmly on the path it’s on now and civil and voting rights for the nation’s minorities was not high on its agenda.

 

The House still reserves the right to veto any legislation the DC city council passes, and has done so recently, and some in Congress have even introduced legislation (which fortunately got nowhere) to repeal home rule.

 

I leave it to readers to make what you will of this situation, but submit that worrying about the number of Democrats in the House and Senate is not the primary reason Republicans oppose DC statehood—not by a long shot.

Monday, December 18, 2023

The De(con)struction of the Republican Party

When I was a kid growing up in rural East Texas, the thugs running around wearing sheets and burning crosses were all Democrats. Back then, for the most part, the Republican Party was still the Party of Lincoln—at least as far as the south was concerned.

 

Things were happening, though, that turned that situation on its ear, one of which was the Civil Rights Movement, when African Americans in the south finally said ‘enough is enough, it’s time that this country delivered on the promises made in its founding documents.

 

About the time of this movement, many Republicans began to notice that Democrats outside the south were siding with labor, women, immigrants, and (heaven forbid) minorities, and were becoming dominant in urban areas where most of the minorities and immigrants resided. So, some Republicans began changing their focus to angry White men and rural dwellers, and a lot of those southern Democrats jumped ship and joined them, especially after Lyndon Johnson, a southern Democrat from Texas supported the Civil Rights Act.

 

Today, I watch the not-so-slow devolution of the Grand Old Party into an assemblage of misanthropes, misogynists, and white supremacists, and I can’t help but wonder—how long, how much longer can it survive before it implodes.

 

I was actually a Republican once. Like I said, where I grew up it was the Democrats who wore sheets and burned crosses. I changed over to the Democratic Party when I realized that it was no longer them doing these things. Those Democrats were now Republicans.

 

Those are the people who give their loyalty to a man who thinks that Al Capone was a ‘great’ man, and who admires dictators like Putin of Russia and Kim Jong-Un of North Korea. They cheer him when he says that if he’s elected president, he’ll be a dictator for a day, and will sic the Justice Department and IRS on the media, his political opponents, and any Republicans who were ‘disloyal’ to him.

 

You have some Republicans who try to say that he’s only ‘joking,’ as if joking about such things is the appropriate thing to do, while others (with a few notable exceptions) keep quiet for fear that they’ll anger his fans.

 

It’s not just one person, or one place that’s showing frays at the seams either. Republicans in Congress object to the U.S. Army removing a Confederate monument from Arlington National Cemetery, a place where those who have fought and died to defend the Constitution are laid to rest. The monument, on the other hand, honors those who took up arms against that same Constitution and who try to paint the enslavement of others as ‘not such a bad thing.’ These people want to rewrite history to take out the parts they don’t like, as in Florida when the governor supported a change in the African American history curriculum that said that those enslaved learn skills that benefited them. I’m still laughing over that one to keep from screaming and pulling my hair.

 

In Texas, the governor, the Republican-controlled legislature, and the Republican State Supreme Court have decided to replace doctors when it comes to decisions about a pregnant woman’s health, putting women—especially poor women who can’t afford to leave the damn state to get proper treatment—and then the state attorney general had the gall to say that women should sue their doctors over the inability to get the proper treatment, not the jackasses who put legal barriers in place.

 

Hypocrisy seems to be the new motto of this once noble party. They call for prosecution of a woman who gets an abortion, but want clemency for the thugs who invaded and desecrated the Capitol on January 6, 2021. They are against same-sex marriage, but the chair of one state party was recently accused of rape and of engaging in orgies with his wife and other women—the wife, by the way, is a member of school boards and is part of a group that wants to ban books that they consider offensive.

 

I could go on and on ad infinitum, but I think the point is made. Politics is truly the last refuge of scoundrels, but one of America’s two main parties has elevated that phrase to new heights. It has become a haven for scam artists, serial liars, and wannabe autocrats who make accusations about bad behavior while trying to keep their own bad behavior from view. Well, some of them do. Others act as bad as they please in full view, and when caught, deny, deflect, and distract.

 

They are dancing with the devil. But what will they do when he music stops?

Wednesday, December 13, 2023

Understanding politics and politicians - follow the money

There once was a time, long, long ago, when politicians campaigned vigorously and then, when they were elected, they spent a good bit of their time actually trying to pass legislation that was good for the country as a whole. This included working with members of the other party.

I doubt if any readers under 40 remember such times, though. These days, politicians spend all their time fund-raising, campaigning, and actively trying to block anything that the other party wants to do. It’s kind of like two gangs of bullies on the playground. One group wants to play stick ball and the other wants to play tag, but they spend so much time trying to ruin the other side’s game, they don’t get to play and, worse, they muck up the playground so much, that the kids who don’t belong to either gang can’t play anything either.

Most of us American voters are like that third group of kids. The politicians—most of them, but especially those in a certain party that many of you know very well—are so busy politicking, they hardly ever get around to doing things that benefit us.

As a writer, even though I have definite political beliefs, I am on the mailing lists of political groups of all stripes, so I can have a good idea of what’s going on all over the place.  So, I know that what the pols are mostly doing is begging for money because most of the emails I get are asking for money—lots and lots of money.

They do and say some really outrageous things to scare you into donating too. Take an email I received this morning (for the second time this week):

 

Friend –

Democrats launched a brand new coordinated plot to make it harder for Republicans to win elections. Take a look: 

FIRST: Deep-blue cities like New York and Washington D.C. authorized voting for illegal immigrants. THEN: Joe Biden sued red states for voter identification laws. NOW: Democrats are filing legal action in North Carolina to gut strong election integrity measures.

We’re racing toward the most important election of our lifetimes. There’s no time to mess around so I’m taking matters into my own hands. 

 

**********************************************

Should it be FEDERAL LAW to require a government-issued ID to vote in U.S. elections?

Goal: 100% Response Rate
Progress: 41.3% Responses Received
Friend’s Response: 
MISSING

 

 

**********************************************


I just launched a new poll to hear it directly from you. So if you believe it should be mandatory to present an ID to vote… then I’d like to hear from you immediately. 

Democrats are behind closed doors plotting to revive their election-rigging scheme (H.R. 1) the SECOND they have the chance. 

We can stop them BUT ONLY with an overwhelming response from our grassroots team.

If they see the American People are completely against them, they’ll have no choice but to scrap their plans. That’s where you come in. 

I’m personally asking for your input. Please respond as soon as possible.

Your opinion could decide the fate of our elections.

God bless you,
Steve Scalise

 

While this looks and sounds like a survey asking your input, it’s in reality another solicitation for donations. When you click on the link ‘RESPOND HERE’, you’re taken to:

 



Which is basically asking you to pony up money. Worse, this guy is from one of those State’s rights states, who is always screaming about keeping the federal government out of his business—until he wants the federal government to force people to do things the way he wants them to. He makes it sound like the dozen or so cities that allow foreign residents to vote in local elections, usually school board elections if they have children in school are undermining American democracy. The fact is that people like him, who once required poll taxes and literacy tests for minorities, and who fought for decades to deny women the right to vote, are the ones who are undermining our democracy.

If you get an email like this, and you’re not a writer looking to see what every side is doing, my advice is delete it without reading.

Post-election turmoil in Sierra Leone

 UNHAPPY ARMY

Sierra Leone: Uprising the work of ‘bunch of dissidents who plotted failed August coup’ – source

By Marché Arends

Posted on November 27, 2023 16:16

Sierra Leone’s President Julius Maada Bio in Freetown, Sierra Leone, June 24, 2023. REUTERS/Cooper Inveen
Sierra Leone’s President Julius Maada Bio in Freetown, Sierra Leone, June 24, 2023. REUTERS/Cooper Inveen

State security forces arrested members of an armed group that attacked a military base and prisons in Sierra Leone on Sunday in what appears to have been an attempted coup.

Most leaders of the armed group that attacked a strategically important military base and broke into prisons in Sierra Leone’s capital Freetown on Sunday morning have been apprehended.

The armed group targeted the armoury at the Wilberforce Military Barracks situated about 15 minutes from the Presidential Lodge, and freed prisoners from Pademba Road Prison.

Following news of the attack, President Julius Maada Bio imposed a nationwide curfew that has since been lifted.

“The peace of our beloved nation is priceless, and we shall continue to protect the security of Sierra Leone against the forces that wish to truncate our much-cherished stability,” read a statement issued by Bio from his official residence.

The move is seen as an attempt to unseat Bio, who was elected to a second term earlier this year in an election contested by both opposition members and international observers.

August surprise

President Julius Maada Bio’s government is rejecting opposition party claims that the attacks on the armoury at Wilberforce on 26 November and subsequent running battles in Freetown were orchestrated to scupper political negotiations after the disputed elections in June.

A source close to the Maada Bio government told The Africa Report: “This operation was launched by a bunch of dissidents who had plotted a coup in August … but on both occasions, their actions didn’t win support among the army.”

Asked why President Bio had declined to describe the operation as a military coup, the source said: “We’re looking at how this played out and the threshold for a coup is quite low – some of the players can be civilians.”

“This operation doesn’t seem to have got beyond a group getting into the amoury, pulling out weapons, releasing some prisoners but then failing to win people to their side,” added the source.

Bio’s Sierra Leone People’s Party (SLPP) and the opposition All People’s Congress (APC) signed a peace accord last month under which a committee to review the elections would be set up and all political prisoners would be released. The APC had agreed to instruct its representatives to return to parliament and local councils.

Some leading opposition figures close to APC leader Samura Kamara and former national President Ernest Bai Koroma accused the Bio government of sabotaging the political accord and ordering attacks on senior opposition politicians.

Late yesterday ex-President Koroma posted on social media: “I’m deeply concerned over the unfolding events in Freetown and I condemn the grave breaches of state security. I also condemn the tragic loss of Corporal Eddie Conteh, a dedicated military guard assigned to me who was killed on duty at my residence.” Koroma added that Warrant Officer John Swarray was taken away from his residence in Freetown by “armed men”.

Pressure cooker

In the five months since Bio resumed power, Sierra Leone has been the site of intense post-election violence, government boycotts, and is on the receiving end of strong criticism from both inside and outside the country.

The results of the June polls were rejected by opposition candidates and condemned by international observers, including the US and the EU, who pointed to a lack of transparency in the electoral process.

This year’s election was the fifth since the 11-year civil war which came to an end in 2002.

Bio, 59, faces mounting pressure as economic conditions in the country continue to deteriorate.

Surge of coups

These latest developments in Sierra Leone come after a string of military takeovers in West and Central Africa – eight in total since 2020, with the latest putsches taking place in Gabon and Niger this year.

The region has struggled to shake off its reputation as Africa’s so-called “coup belt”, which is home to a stretch of military-run countries from the Red Sea to the Atlantic.

The Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) has thrown its support behind Bio’s government, saying in a statement on Sunday that the bloc has “zero-tolerance for unconstitutional change of government”.

Democracy has not failed Africa says UN ambassador Thomas-Greenfield

 UPRISING

Coup epidemic: Democracy has not failed Africa, says Thomas-Greenfield

By Kent Mensah


Posted on December 12, 2023 14:34

US Ambassador to the UN Linda Thomas-Greenfield at the UN Security Council meeting in New York,, November 2023. (Reuters/Brendan McDermid)
US Ambassador to the UN Linda Thomas-Greenfield at the UN Security Council meeting in New York,, November 2023. (Reuters/Brendan McDermid)

The sudden rise in military takeovers in West Africa stems from issues of poor governance and insecurity, rather than a diminished appetite for democracy, says US ambassador to the UN Linda Thomas-Greenfield.

Since 2020 the continent has witnessed not less than 10 successful and attempted putsches in West and Central Africa and the Sahel region. Until the recent failed coups in Guinea-Bissau and Sierra Leone, Africa recorded junta takeovers in Mali, Guinea, Sudan, Chad, Burkina Faso, Niger, and Gabon.

Since the beginning of last year, The Gambia and Sao Tome and Principe have all witnessed failed coup attempts.

“I think first and foremost it has been insecurity and terrorism; countries are dealing with significant insecurity,” US ambassador to the UN Thomas-Greenfield tells The Africa Report in reference to the factors leading to the coups.

“It’s also a lack of [good] governance [and] lack of providing opportunity to the people,” she adds.

Has democracy failed Africa?

Unlike previous insurrections, civilians now appear to be backing the wave of coups in Africa, raising questions about the effectiveness of democratic governance in the continent.

According to an Afrobarometer survey dated September 2022, sentiments against elections as enablers of change have risen by 6% in 34 African countries. Although respondents said regular, honest and open elections were the best guarantor of their interests, only 44% believed elections help voters remove bad leaders.

Overall, support for elections has dropped in 26 of 30 African countries including Sudan, Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger, according to the independent political survey body, adding that even in a model democracy like South Africa, the support for elections has dropped 20 percentage points over the past decade.

Thomas-Greenfield says democracy has not failed the continent, adding that it works “when governments deliver for their people”.

“The failure in these countries [coup-hit nations] is not the failure of democracy,” Thomas-Greenfield says, speaking to this journalist on the sidelines of the just-ended UN Peacekeeping ministerial meeting in Ghana’s capital, Accra.

“It is the failure of these countries to implement policies that are democratic – policies that address the expectations and the needs of their people,” she says.

“It’s about creating opportunities, jobs, and education so that young people feel vested in their countries’ future,” the top US diplomat adds.

She condemned the spate of coups in Africa, saying, “The military that takes over the country is not equipped to govern. They are not equipped to provide the support that the population needs.”

Afrobarometer findings from 28 African countries surveyed in 2021-2022 show that only 43% of adults say militaries should never intervene in politics, while a slim majority (53%) are willing to countenance this option if elected leaders abuse power.

Thomas-Greenfield says people need education and jobs, which is certainly the case for junta-led Niger, where the median age is 15.

“Many of these young people tend to welcome these coups, but they very quickly get disappointed that the military is not able to provide for their needs,” she says.

Touching on the stalemate in Niger, she says the junta must “return to a civilian-run government immediately”, opposing the proposed three-year transition plan by the putschists.

“That’s too long, and we know that ECOWAS and neighbouring countries are engaging to push them to go back to the barracks and that’s what we are doing as well.”

Security concerns

Armed terrorist and extremist organisations are rapidly expanding their operations from the Sahel region to coastal West Africa, capitalising on the instability prevalent in many of these nations, exacerbated by porous borders and rampant smuggling.

While Ghana has not reported any jihadist attacks within its borders, neighbouring Benin has experienced approximately 20 incursions from across the border since 2021, as reported by its military. Additionally, Togo has faced attacks along its northern frontier.

Niger finds itself contending with two jihadist insurgencies – one emanates from the southeast, a spillover from the protracted conflict in Nigeria. The other manifests in the west, where militants cross over from Mali and Burkina Faso.

The toll is particularly grim in Burkina Faso, with over 17,000 fatalities reported in attacks since 2015. This year alone has witnessed more than 6,000 deaths, according to data compiled by the non-governmental organisation Armed Conflict Location and Event Data Project (ACLED).

The military in Mali is also battling Tuareg rebels. The security crisis in the landlocked West African country has been exacerbated as UN peacekeepers deployed to Mali in 2013 began withdrawing on the orders of the junta. The separatist group wants independence for northern Mali and is opposed to the army taking control of bases vacated by the thousands of departing UN troops.

Worse with Wagner

The junta has recruited the services of the mercenary group Wagner to restore stability. However, Thomas-Greenfield says this decision was misguided, adding that the Russian government-backed militia is causing more harm than good, and taking advantage.

“They are not going in to support the people, they are supporting regimes staying in power, and they are not doing it for free. They are taking millions of dollars worth of resources to pay themselves for causing instability,” she says.

“We’ve seen that they’ve committed human rights violations. These countries are even less stable,” says Thomas-Greenfield.

In Mali, even with the junta-led government, the security situation has not improved, it’s gotten worse with Wagner, she says.

“Wagner is not a stabilising force, it supports authoritarianism and violation of human rights,” says the former US assistant secretary of state for African affairs.

Since the beginning of the Biden-Harris administration, the US has invested $6.5bn to support security, democracy, human rights, and governance on the continent. Thomas-Greenfield says the US government will continue to work with African leaders through regional groupings such as ECOWAS and the African Union to maintain peace on the continent and also make coups not the answer to a crisis.

“We’ve imposed sanctions on a number of these countries as well as individuals if they are not contributing to finding a path towards peace,” she says, adding that the US partnership with the African Union is key to making a change in government. Sanctions have also helped,” she says.

“I want to see change take place as quickly as possible … we’re continuing to partner with them to find a path forward so that stability can be re-established in these countries,” she adds.

Featured Post

Vida Designs - A New Place to Get My Photographs

If you like fine photography and fashion, you can now get them both in one place. Voices - Vida now hosts an online shop of custom-designed...