Donald Trump’s alleged statement that he was tired of
people coming to America from Haiti and ‘shithole’ countries in Africa ignited
a storm of controversy, and caused his apologists to pull out all the stops to
refute the claims. Trump has been
accused by many of his critics of racism, while those in his camp vehemently
deny this accusation. I might be misreading the whole thing, but the racism
charge seems to be based mainly on his alleged use of the term ‘shithole’ to
describe countries in Africa, along with his preference for people from Norway.
While Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL) maintains that this
was what Trump said, Senator David Perdue (R-GA), after initially saying that
he didn’t ‘recall’ the president using such a term, later came out and told
George Stephanopoulos of ABC’s “This Week” that he ‘did not use that word.’
Senator Tom Cotton (R-AR) said he didn’t hear Trump say ‘that word.’ Kirstjen
Nielsen, Homeland Security Secretary, who was also in the meeting, told Fox
News that she didn’t recall Trump saying ‘that exact phrase,’ but conceded that
the conversation about immigration was ‘impassioned.’
Now, we can rant and rave forever about whether or not
Trump called African countries ‘shithole’ countries, but I’d like to point out
something that everyone seems to be ignoring. None of the Trump apologists have
denied that he expressed displeasure at immigrants coming from Haiti and African
countries, and would prefer Norwegians. Maybe they were so busy trying to make
him sound less crass and vulgar, they overlooked it, or maybe he said it, only
without calling the countries in question ‘shitholes.’ So, dear friends,
whether or not he used that exact term is irrelevant. If he said he was frustrated
with immigrants from Haiti and African countries, and would prefer lily white
immigrants from Scandinavia, whether it was intentional or conscious or not, it
was racist—just without the scatological term. The fact that he was expressing
a feeling shared by many of those who support and voted for him is also beside
the point.
I’m sure there will be someone who will immediately
come up with a scenario where he ‘never mentioned Haiti or African countries.’
After all, in this administration, truth is often replaced by alternate facts,
and if the man behind the desk at 1600 Pennsylvania disagrees with it, it’s ‘fake
news.’
So, let the fun begin.
No comments:
Post a Comment